Australia vs Mali: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning

Australia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mali
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
39th
Mali rank
36th

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning over time

  • Australia
  • Mali
00.0020.0040.006199020072024

How they compare

Mali currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.6 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.

Australia ranks 39th and Mali ranks 36th of 185 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Mali Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 t per US$ of GDP 0.0031 t per US$ of GDP 0.0029 t per US$ of GDP Mali
2000s 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0.0008 t per US$ of GDP 0.0008 t per US$ of GDP Mali
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Mali
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Australia or Mali?
Mali, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Australia and Mali?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mali?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and Mali rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Australia ranks 39th and Mali ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Mali: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/mali/">Australia vs Mali: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.