Canada vs Guatemala: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning

Canada
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Guatemala
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Canada rank
44th
Guatemala rank
43rd

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning over time

  • Canada
  • Guatemala
000000199020072024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Canada, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.

Canada ranks 44th and Guatemala ranks 43rd of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0001 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), Canada or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Canada as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between Canada and Guatemala?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Guatemala?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Canada and Guatemala rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
Canada ranks 44th and Guatemala ranks 43rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Guatemala: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/guatemala/">Canada vs Guatemala: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.