China vs Namibia: Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning

China
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
88th
Namibia rank
91st

Savanna and woody savanna: Burning crop residues … unit GDP Burning over time

  • China
  • Namibia
00.0020.0040.006199020072024

How they compare

China currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

China ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 91st of 185 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0029 t per US$ of GDP 0.0029 t per US$ of GDP Namibia
2000s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0.0006 t per US$ of GDP 0.0006 t per US$ of GDP Namibia
2010s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Namibia
2020s 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP 0 t per US$ of GDP Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned), China or Namibia?
China, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned) between China and Namibia?
0 t per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do China and Namibia rank globally for savanna and woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned)?
China ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Namibia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/china/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-and-woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/china/namibia/">China vs Namibia: Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit
t per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna and woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.