Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
-43.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Timor-Leste
-39.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
89th
Timor-Leste rank
86th

Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Timor-Leste
02505007501.0k199120072024

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports -39.31 % change on previous year against -43.01 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 3.7 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Timor-Leste ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 89th and Timor-Leste ranks 86th of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 12.76 % change on previous year 106.8 % change on previous year 94.04 % change on previous year Timor-Leste
2000s -0.7738 % change on previous year 105.28 % change on previous year 106.06 % change on previous year Timor-Leste
2010s -13.82 % change on previous year 100.9 % change on previous year 114.72 % change on previous year Timor-Leste
2020s -24.62 % change on previous year -71.33 % change on previous year 46.71 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at -39.31 % change on previous year against -43.01 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
3.7 % change on previous year, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 89th and Timor-Leste ranks 86th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 5,628 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.