China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
124th
Latvia rank
124th

Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Latvia
-1000100200300199120062022

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Latvia ranks 124th of 177 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s -12.96 % change on previous year -12.52 % change on previous year 0.4377 % change on previous year Latvia
2000s -56.22 % change on previous year -75.21 % change on previous year 18.99 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s -9.75 % change on previous year -30.27 % change on previous year 20.52 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
16 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2019.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Latvia ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/latvia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 5,628 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.