Czechia vs Sweden: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Czechia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Czechia rank
124th
Sweden rank
124th
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Czechia
- Sweden
How they compare
Czechia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Sweden ahead.
Czechia ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -33.33 % change on previous year | -33.33 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2010s | 299.96 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 399.96 % change on previous year | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Czechia or Sweden?
- Czechia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Czechia and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Sweden rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Czechia ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 124th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.