Equatorial Guinea vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate

Equatorial Guinea
200 % change on previous year
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
9.06 % change on previous year
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
13th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
16th

Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-1000100200199120072024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 200 % change on previous year against 9.06 % change on previous year in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 190.94 % change on previous year.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 22.1 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 16th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s -16.67 % change on previous year -3.16 % change on previous year 13.51 % change on previous year Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 200 % change on previous year 9.06 % change on previous year 190.94 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Equatorial Guinea or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Equatorial Guinea, at 200 % change on previous year against 9.06 % change on previous year in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Equatorial Guinea and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
190.94 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 13th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 16th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Equatorial Guinea vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 5,628 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.