What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 % change on previous year, with Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands?

6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Falkland Islands (Malvinas) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate

Falkland Islands (Malvinas)

-100 % change on previous year

in 2024

Turks and Caicos Islands

-100 % change on previous year

in 2010

Falkland Islands (Malvinas) rank

124th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

124th

Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Falkland Islands (Malvinas) currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 124th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 124th of 177 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Falkland Islands (Malvinas) or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Falkland Islands (Malvinas), at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 % change on previous year, with Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
How do Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?: Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 124th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Falkland Islands (Malvinas) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/falkland-islands-malvinas/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/falkland-islands-malvinas/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Falkland Islands (Malvinas) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 209 places, 5,628 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed: 03 October 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.