Iceland vs Mauritania: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Iceland rank
124th
Mauritania rank
124th
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Iceland
- Mauritania
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 124th and Mauritania ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2020s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Iceland or Mauritania?
- Iceland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Iceland and Mauritania?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Iceland ranks 124th and Mauritania ranks 124th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.