Mauritius vs Norway: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Mauritius rank
124th
Norway rank
124th
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Mauritius
- Norway
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.
Mauritius ranks 124th and Norway ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.31 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 26.97 % change on previous year | Mauritius |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | 116.48 % change on previous year | 216.48 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Mauritius or Norway?
- Mauritius, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2013.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Mauritius and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2007.
- How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Mauritius ranks 124th and Norway ranks 124th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.