Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Polynesia: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
124th
Polynesia rank
124th
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Polynesia
How they compare
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 124th and Polynesia ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Polynesia?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Polynesia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Polynesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Polynesia rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 124th and Polynesia ranks 124th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.