Polynesia vs Serbia and Montenegro: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Polynesia
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Serbia and Montenegro
-100 % change on previous year
in 2004
Polynesia rank
124th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
124th
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Polynesia
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Polynesia ranks 124th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Polynesia or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Polynesia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro as of 1999.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Polynesia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Polynesia and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Polynesia ranks 124th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 124th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.