Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
124th
Sweden rank
124th
Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Sweden
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Sweden?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2011.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden rank globally for savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 124th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.