Africa vs South Sudan: Savanna — Burned Area
Africa
105.21 million ha
in 2024
South Sudan
16.10 million ha
in 2024
Africa rank
3rd
South Sudan rank
3rd
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Africa
- South Sudan
How they compare
Africa currently reports 105.21 million ha against 16.10 million ha in South Sudan, a difference of 89.12 million ha.
That makes Africa's figure about 6.5 times South Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Africa has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 31 groups.
Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 112.42 million ha | 15.53 million ha | 96.89 million ha | Africa |
| 2020s | 103.89 million ha | 14.64 million ha | 89.25 million ha | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Africa or South Sudan?
- Africa, at 105.21 million ha against 16.10 million ha in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Africa and South Sudan?
- 89.12 million ha, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Africa and South Sudan rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Africa ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.