Australia and New Zealand vs Congo: Savanna — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
2.63 million ha
in 2024
Congo
1.62 million ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
11th
Congo rank
14th

Savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Congo
05.0M10.0M15.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 2.63 million ha against 1.62 million ha in Congo, a difference of 1.02 million ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.6 times Congo's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and Congo ranks 14th of 221 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 7.48 million ha 664,654 ha 6.82 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 6.07 million ha 777,691 ha 5.30 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 4.73 million ha 1.27 million ha 3.47 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.24 million ha 1.17 million ha 2.07 million ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Congo?
Australia and New Zealand, at 2.63 million ha against 1.62 million ha in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Congo?
1.02 million ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Congo?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Congo rank globally for savanna — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 11th and Congo ranks 14th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Congo: Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/congo-rep/">Australia and New Zealand vs Congo: Savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.