Bahamas vs Uruguay: Savanna — Burned Area
Bahamas
4,713 ha
in 2024
Uruguay
3,283 ha
in 2024
Bahamas rank
71st
Uruguay rank
74th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Bahamas
- Uruguay
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 4,713 ha against 3,283 ha in Uruguay, a difference of 1,430 ha.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.4 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
Bahamas ranks 71st and Uruguay ranks 74th of 221 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,650 ha | 5,755 ha | 2,105 ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 7,274 ha | 13,424 ha | 6,150 ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 6,066 ha | 7,522 ha | 1,457 ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 2,340 ha | 10,299 ha | 7,959 ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Bahamas or Uruguay?
- Bahamas, at 4,713 ha against 3,283 ha in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Bahamas and Uruguay?
- 1,430 ha, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Uruguay rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Bahamas ranks 71st and Uruguay ranks 74th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.