Bangladesh vs Serbia and Montenegro: Savanna — Burned Area
Bangladesh
21.41 ha
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 ha
in 2005
Bangladesh rank
117th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Bangladesh
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 21.41 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 21.41 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 117th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Serbia and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 395.57 ha | 322.02 ha | 73.56 ha | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 366.34 ha | 586.21 ha | 219.87 ha | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Bangladesh or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Bangladesh, at 21.41 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Bangladesh and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 21.41 ha, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Bangladesh and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Bangladesh ranks 117th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.