Barbados vs Lesotho: Savanna — Burned Area
Barbados
0 ha
in 2024
Lesotho
0 ha
in 2024
Barbados rank
119th
Lesotho rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Barbados
- Lesotho
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Barbados ranks 119th and Lesotho ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8849 ha | 13,166 ha | 13,165 ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 2,778 ha | 2,778 ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | Barbados |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 0 ha | 4.28 ha | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Barbados or Lesotho?
- Barbados, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Barbados and Lesotho?
- 0 ha, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Lesotho?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Lesotho rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Barbados ranks 119th and Lesotho ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.