Belarus vs El Salvador: Savanna — Burned Area
Belarus
495.66 ha
in 2024
El Salvador
684.36 ha
in 2024
Belarus rank
92nd
El Salvador rank
90th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 684.36 ha against 495.66 ha in Belarus, a difference of 188.7 ha.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.4 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 92nd and El Salvador ranks 90th of 221 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,201 ha | 1,089 ha | 2,112 ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 7,659 ha | 1,366 ha | 6,294 ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 7,634 ha | 3,236 ha | 4,398 ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 5,607 ha | 1,202 ha | 4,405 ha | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Belarus or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 684.36 ha against 495.66 ha in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 188.7 ha, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Belarus ranks 92nd and El Salvador ranks 90th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.