Belgium-Luxembourg vs Serbia and Montenegro: Savanna — Burned Area
Belgium-Luxembourg
0 ha
in 1999
Serbia and Montenegro
0 ha
in 2005
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
119th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro as of 1999.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.