Burkina Faso vs Slovakia: Savanna — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Slovakia
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
119th
Slovakia rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Slovakia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovakia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 119th and Slovakia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 983,200 ha | 2.55 ha | 983,197 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 225,602 ha | 10.92 ha | 225,591 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 66.27 ha | 0 ha | 66.27 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Burkina Faso or Slovakia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Burkina Faso and Slovakia?
- 0 ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Slovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Slovakia rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 119th and Slovakia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.