Chile vs Rwanda: Savanna — Burned Area
Chile
18,654 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
14,232 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
60th
Rwanda rank
61st
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Chile currently reports 18,654 ha against 14,232 ha in Rwanda, a difference of 4,422 ha.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 61st of 221 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,770 ha | 7,158 ha | 2,611 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 8,271 ha | 4,333 ha | 3,938 ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 28,243 ha | 4,755 ha | 23,488 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 19,914 ha | 9,317 ha | 10,597 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Chile or Rwanda?
- Chile, at 18,654 ha against 14,232 ha in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Chile and Rwanda?
- 4,422 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Chile ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 61st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.