Chile vs Suriname: Savanna — Burned Area
Chile
18,654 ha
in 2024
Suriname
12,952 ha
in 2024
Chile rank
60th
Suriname rank
62nd
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Chile
- Suriname
How they compare
Chile currently reports 18,654 ha against 12,952 ha in Suriname, a difference of 5,702 ha.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 60th and Suriname ranks 62nd of 221 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,770 ha | 3,489 ha | 6,280 ha | Chile |
| 2000s | 8,271 ha | 6,353 ha | 1,918 ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 28,243 ha | 5,697 ha | 22,545 ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 19,914 ha | 5,270 ha | 14,644 ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Chile or Suriname?
- Chile, at 18,654 ha against 12,952 ha in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Chile and Suriname?
- 5,702 ha, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Chile ranks 60th and Suriname ranks 62nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.