Cuba vs Ecuador: Savanna — Burned Area
Cuba
46,887 ha
in 2024
Ecuador
43,917 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
49th
Ecuador rank
51st
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- Ecuador
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 46,887 ha against 43,917 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 2,970 ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 49th and Ecuador ranks 51st of 221 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26,400 ha | 11,249 ha | 15,150 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 53,928 ha | 13,057 ha | 40,871 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 37,098 ha | 20,509 ha | 16,588 ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 61,539 ha | 28,235 ha | 33,304 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Cuba or Ecuador?
- Cuba, at 46,887 ha against 43,917 ha in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Cuba and Ecuador?
- 2,970 ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ecuador?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Ecuador rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 49th and Ecuador ranks 51st of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.