Ecuador vs Nepal: Savanna — Burned Area
Ecuador
43,917 ha
in 2024
Nepal
46,296 ha
in 2024
Ecuador rank
51st
Nepal rank
50th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Ecuador
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 46,296 ha against 43,917 ha in Ecuador, a difference of 2,379 ha.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 50th of 221 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,249 ha | 7,128 ha | 4,121 ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 13,057 ha | 6,734 ha | 6,323 ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 20,509 ha | 11,304 ha | 9,206 ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 28,235 ha | 26,573 ha | 1,662 ha | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Ecuador or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 46,296 ha against 43,917 ha in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Ecuador and Nepal?
- 2,379 ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Nepal ranks 50th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.