El Salvador vs Georgia: Savanna — Burned Area
El Salvador
684.36 ha
in 2024
Georgia
1,226 ha
in 2024
El Salvador rank
90th
Georgia rank
87th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- El Salvador
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 1,226 ha against 684.36 ha in El Salvador, a difference of 541.64 ha.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.8 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 90th and Georgia ranks 87th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,089 ha | 725.77 ha | 363.41 ha | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 1,366 ha | 582.23 ha | 783.32 ha | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 3,236 ha | 1,512 ha | 1,724 ha | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 1,202 ha | 1,312 ha | 109.7 ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, El Salvador or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 1,226 ha against 684.36 ha in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between El Salvador and Georgia?
- 541.64 ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- El Salvador ranks 90th and Georgia ranks 87th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.