Which has higher savanna — burned area, Equatorial Guinea or Poland?

Equatorial Guinea, at 64.11 ha against 43.12 ha in Poland as of 2024.

What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Equatorial Guinea and Poland?

20.99 ha, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Poland?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Savanna — Burned Area

Equatorial Guinea

64.11 ha

in 2024

Poland

43.12 ha

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea rank

105th

Poland rank

106th

Savanna — Burned Area over time

Equatorial Guinea
Poland

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 64.11 ha against 43.12 ha in Poland, a difference of 20.99 ha.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 105th and Poland ranks 106th of 221 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Poland	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.77 ha	328.27 ha	326.5 ha	Poland
2000s	0 ha	997.69 ha	997.69 ha	Poland
2010s	0 ha	409.43 ha	409.43 ha	Poland
2020s	17.1 ha	353.41 ha	336.32 ha	Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, Equatorial Guinea or Poland?: Equatorial Guinea, at 64.11 ha against 43.12 ha in Poland as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Equatorial Guinea and Poland?: 20.99 ha, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Poland?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Poland rank globally for savanna — burned area?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 105th and Poland ranks 106th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/poland/">Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Savanna — Burned Area
Unit: ha
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.