Estonia vs Turkmenistan: Savanna — Burned Area
Estonia
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Estonia rank
119th
Turkmenistan rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Estonia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.96 ha | 51.32 ha | 24.37 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 90.92 ha | 30.95 ha | 59.97 ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 53.95 ha | 0 ha | 53.95 ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 4.32 ha | 0 ha | 4.32 ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Estonia or Turkmenistan?
- Estonia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Estonia and Turkmenistan?
- 0 ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Turkmenistan rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Estonia ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.