Eswatini vs Guatemala: Savanna — Burned Area
Eswatini
31,025 ha
in 2024
Guatemala
30,073 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
55th
Guatemala rank
56th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Guatemala
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 31,025 ha against 30,073 ha in Guatemala, a difference of 952 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Eswatini ranks 55th and Guatemala ranks 56th of 221 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,531 ha | 30,176 ha | 10,645 ha | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 9,336 ha | 41,484 ha | 32,148 ha | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 15,279 ha | 36,889 ha | 21,610 ha | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 16,001 ha | 31,869 ha | 15,868 ha | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Eswatini or Guatemala?
- Eswatini, at 31,025 ha against 30,073 ha in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Eswatini and Guatemala?
- 952 ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guatemala?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Guatemala rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 55th and Guatemala ranks 56th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.