Eswatini vs Peru: Savanna — Burned Area
Eswatini
31,025 ha
in 2024
Peru
34,991 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
55th
Peru rank
52nd
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 34,991 ha against 31,025 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 3,966 ha.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 55th and Peru ranks 52nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,531 ha | 6,996 ha | 12,535 ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 9,336 ha | 8,454 ha | 881.92 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 15,279 ha | 11,836 ha | 3,443 ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 16,001 ha | 16,960 ha | 958.75 ha | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Eswatini or Peru?
- Peru, at 34,991 ha against 31,025 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Eswatini and Peru?
- 3,966 ha, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Peru rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 55th and Peru ranks 52nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.