Finland vs Jamaica: Savanna — Burned Area
Finland
0 ha
in 2024
Jamaica
21.4 ha
in 2024
Finland rank
119th
Jamaica rank
118th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Finland
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 21.4 ha against 0 ha in Finland, a difference of 21.4 ha.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 119th and Jamaica ranks 118th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.87 ha | 121.2 ha | 37.33 ha | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 204.82 ha | 55.85 ha | 148.97 ha | Finland |
| 2010s | 151.14 ha | 173.32 ha | 22.18 ha | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 111.27 ha | 111.27 ha | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Finland or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 21.4 ha against 0 ha in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Finland and Jamaica?
- 21.4 ha, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Jamaica?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Jamaica rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Finland ranks 119th and Jamaica ranks 118th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.