Georgia vs Iceland: Savanna — Burned Area
Georgia
1,226 ha
in 2024
Iceland
1,447 ha
in 2024
Georgia rank
87th
Iceland rank
84th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Georgia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1,447 ha against 1,226 ha in Georgia, a difference of 221 ha.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 84th of 221 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 725.77 ha | 26.44 ha | 699.33 ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 582.23 ha | 4.32 ha | 577.91 ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 1,512 ha | 0 ha | 1,512 ha | Georgia |
| 2020s | 1,312 ha | 298.11 ha | 1,013 ha | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Georgia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1,447 ha against 1,226 ha in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Georgia and Iceland?
- 221 ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iceland?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Iceland rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Georgia ranks 87th and Iceland ranks 84th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.