Honduras vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burned Area
Honduras
144,097 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
187,396 ha
in 2024
Honduras rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
35th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Honduras
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 187,396 ha against 144,097 ha in Honduras, a difference of 43,299 ha.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Honduras ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 221 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50,902 ha | 1.71 million ha | 1.66 million ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 74,332 ha | 560,812 ha | 486,480 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 82,477 ha | 466,986 ha | 384,510 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 128,338 ha | 187,538 ha | 59,200 ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Honduras or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 187,396 ha against 144,097 ha in Honduras as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Honduras and Zimbabwe?
- 43,299 ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Honduras and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Honduras ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.