Hungary vs Tunisia: Savanna — Burned Area
Hungary
107.63 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
107.36 ha
in 2024
Hungary rank
100th
Tunisia rank
102nd
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Hungary
- Tunisia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 107.63 ha against 107.36 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0.27 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 228.06 ha | 53.05 ha | 175.01 ha | Hungary |
| 2000s | 630.81 ha | 4.29 ha | 626.51 ha | Hungary |
| 2010s | 409.04 ha | 154.59 ha | 254.45 ha | Hungary |
| 2020s | 124.86 ha | 158.9 ha | 34.03 ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Hungary or Tunisia?
- Hungary, at 107.63 ha against 107.36 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Hungary and Tunisia?
- 0.27 ha, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Tunisia rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Hungary ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.