Iceland vs Kazakhstan: Savanna — Burned Area
Iceland
1,447 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan
1,399 ha
in 2024
Iceland rank
84th
Kazakhstan rank
85th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Iceland
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1,447 ha against 1,399 ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 48 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Iceland ranks 84th and Kazakhstan ranks 85th of 221 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.44 ha | 12,019 ha | 11,992 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4.32 ha | 17,025 ha | 17,021 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 6,124 ha | 6,124 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 298.11 ha | 15,133 ha | 14,835 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Iceland or Kazakhstan?
- Iceland, at 1,447 ha against 1,399 ha in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Iceland and Kazakhstan?
- 48 ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Kazakhstan rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Iceland ranks 84th and Kazakhstan ranks 85th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.