Lesotho vs Mauritius: Savanna — Burned Area
Lesotho
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Lesotho rank
119th
Mauritius rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Lesotho
- Mauritius
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,166 ha | 13.09 ha | 13,153 ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 2,778 ha | 8.56 ha | 2,769 ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | 2.14 ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Lesotho or Mauritius?
- Lesotho, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Lesotho and Mauritius?
- 0 ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Mauritius rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Lesotho ranks 119th and Mauritius ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.