Libya vs Polynesia: Savanna — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Polynesia
0 ha
in 2024
Libya rank
131st
Polynesia rank
131st
Savanna — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Polynesia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 131st and Polynesia ranks 131st of 238 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 2.13 ha | 2.13 ha | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area — fao tier 1, Libya or Polynesia?
- Libya, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area — fao tier 1 between Libya and Polynesia?
- 0 ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Polynesia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Polynesia rank globally for savanna — burned area — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 131st and Polynesia ranks 131st of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.