Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Sudan: Savanna — Burned Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
73.63 million ha
in 2024
South Sudan
16.10 million ha
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
South Sudan rank
3rd

Savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • South Sudan
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 73.63 million ha against 16.10 million ha in South Sudan, a difference of 57.53 million ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.6 times South Sudan's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 79.87 million ha 15.53 million ha 64.35 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 72.87 million ha 14.64 million ha 58.23 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or South Sudan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 73.63 million ha against 16.10 million ha in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Sudan?
57.53 million ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Sudan?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Sudan rank globally for savanna — burned area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and South Sudan ranks 3rd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Sudan: Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/south-sudan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Sudan: Savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.