Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zambia: Savanna — Burned Area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
73.63 million ha
in 2024
Zambia
11.91 million ha
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th
Zambia rank
4th

Savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Zambia
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 73.63 million ha against 11.91 million ha in Zambia, a difference of 61.72 million ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.2 times Zambia's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 4th of 31 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 73.18 million ha 9.61 million ha 63.57 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 85.03 million ha 11.67 million ha 73.36 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 80.93 million ha 12.32 million ha 68.61 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 72.87 million ha 11.56 million ha 61.31 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burned area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Zambia?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 73.63 million ha against 11.91 million ha in Zambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zambia?
61.72 million ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zambia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Zambia rank globally for savanna — burned area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 4th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zambia: Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/zambia/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Zambia: Savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.