Mauritius vs Slovenia: Savanna — Burned Area
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Slovenia
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
119th
Slovenia rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Mauritius
- Slovenia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.67 ha | 3.71 ha | 10.96 ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 8.56 ha | 0 ha | 8.56 ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 6.46 ha | 4.31 ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 30.12 ha | 30.12 ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Mauritius or Slovenia?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Mauritius ranks 119th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.