Nepal vs Philippines: Savanna — Burned Area
Nepal
46,296 ha
in 2024
Philippines
60,165 ha
in 2024
Nepal rank
50th
Philippines rank
47th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Nepal
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 60,165 ha against 46,296 ha in Nepal, a difference of 13,869 ha.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.
Nepal ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 47th of 221 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,128 ha | 19,880 ha | 12,751 ha | Philippines |
| 2000s | 6,734 ha | 34,398 ha | 27,664 ha | Philippines |
| 2010s | 11,304 ha | 38,858 ha | 27,555 ha | Philippines |
| 2020s | 26,573 ha | 33,829 ha | 7,256 ha | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Nepal or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 60,165 ha against 46,296 ha in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Nepal and Philippines?
- 13,869 ha, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Philippines rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Nepal ranks 50th and Philippines ranks 47th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.