New Caledonia vs Serbia: Savanna — Burned Area
New Caledonia
6,550 ha
in 2024
Serbia
8,258 ha
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
68th
Serbia rank
65th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- New Caledonia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 8,258 ha against 6,550 ha in New Caledonia, a difference of 1,708 ha.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 65th of 221 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 898.99 ha | 4,344 ha | 3,445 ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1,423 ha | 1,641 ha | 217.27 ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2,736 ha | 2,391 ha | 344.2 ha | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, New Caledonia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 8,258 ha against 6,550 ha in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 1,708 ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Serbia rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- New Caledonia ranks 68th and Serbia ranks 65th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.