North Macedonia vs Spain: Savanna — Burned Area
North Macedonia
5,202 ha
in 2024
Spain
3,910 ha
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
70th
Spain rank
73rd
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- North Macedonia
- Spain
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 5,202 ha against 3,910 ha in Spain, a difference of 1,292 ha.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.3 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Spain ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 70th and Spain ranks 73rd of 221 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 426.19 ha | 7,706 ha | 7,280 ha | Spain |
| 2000s | 635.14 ha | 10,613 ha | 9,978 ha | Spain |
| 2010s | 1,023 ha | 9,561 ha | 8,538 ha | Spain |
| 2020s | 1,389 ha | 11,645 ha | 10,257 ha | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, North Macedonia or Spain?
- North Macedonia, at 5,202 ha against 3,910 ha in Spain as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between North Macedonia and Spain?
- 1,292 ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Spain?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Spain rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- North Macedonia ranks 70th and Spain ranks 73rd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.