Rwanda vs Suriname: Savanna — Burned Area
Rwanda
14,232 ha
in 2024
Suriname
12,952 ha
in 2024
Rwanda rank
61st
Suriname rank
62nd
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Rwanda
- Suriname
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 14,232 ha against 12,952 ha in Suriname, a difference of 1,280 ha.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 62nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,158 ha | 3,489 ha | 3,669 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 4,333 ha | 6,353 ha | 2,021 ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 4,755 ha | 5,697 ha | 942.57 ha | Suriname |
| 2020s | 9,317 ha | 5,270 ha | 4,047 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Rwanda or Suriname?
- Rwanda, at 14,232 ha against 12,952 ha in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Rwanda and Suriname?
- 1,280 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Suriname rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Rwanda ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 62nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.