Samoa vs Serbia and Montenegro: Savanna — Burned Area
Samoa
0 ha
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro
0 ha
in 2005
Samoa rank
119th
Serbia and Montenegro rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Samoa
- Serbia and Montenegro
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Serbia and Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.51 ha | 322.02 ha | 319.5 ha | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 586.21 ha | 586.21 ha | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Samoa or Serbia and Montenegro?
- Samoa, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Samoa and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 0 ha, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Serbia and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Samoa and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Samoa ranks 119th and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.