Slovenia vs Turkmenistan: Savanna — Burned Area
Slovenia
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Slovenia rank
119th
Turkmenistan rank
119th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Slovenia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Slovenia ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.71 ha | 51.32 ha | 47.61 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 30.95 ha | 30.95 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 6.46 ha | 0 ha | 6.46 ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 30.12 ha | 0 ha | 30.12 ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Slovenia or Turkmenistan?
- Slovenia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Slovenia and Turkmenistan?
- 0 ha, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Slovenia and Turkmenistan rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Slovenia ranks 119th and Turkmenistan ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.