Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Savanna — Burned Area
Sri Lanka
171 ha
in 2024
Tunisia
107.36 ha
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
99th
Tunisia rank
102nd
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 171 ha against 107.36 ha in Tunisia, a difference of 63.64 ha.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.6 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 221 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,862 ha | 53.05 ha | 11,809 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 26,040 ha | 4.29 ha | 26,036 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 8,849 ha | 154.59 ha | 8,695 ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 2,834 ha | 158.9 ha | 2,675 ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Sri Lanka, at 171 ha against 107.36 ha in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 63.64 ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 102nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.