Togo vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burned Area
Togo
195,927 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
187,396 ha
in 2024
Togo rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
35th
Savanna — Burned Area over time
- Togo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Togo currently reports 195,927 ha against 187,396 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8,531 ha.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Togo ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 425,821 ha | 1.71 million ha | 1.28 million ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 498,255 ha | 560,812 ha | 62,558 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 449,686 ha | 466,986 ha | 17,300 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 325,040 ha | 187,538 ha | 137,501 ha | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, Togo or Zimbabwe?
- Togo, at 195,927 ha against 187,396 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area between Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 8,531 ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Togo and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — burned area?
- Togo ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.