Austria vs Puerto Rico: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Austria
0 ha per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0 ha per person
in 2024
Austria rank
113th
Puerto Rico rank
113th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Austria
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Austria ranks 113th and Puerto Rico ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Austria |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Austria |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Austria or Puerto Rico?
- Austria, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Austria and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha per person, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Puerto Rico rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Austria ranks 113th and Puerto Rico ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.