Belarus vs Italy: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Belarus
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Italy
0 ha per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
86th
Italy rank
88th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Italy
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Italy, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 86th and Italy ranks 88th of 188 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Belarus or Italy?
- Belarus, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Belarus and Italy?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 86th and Italy ranks 88th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.